Journalled file systems




















The first journaling filesystem to be added to the kernel was actually ReiserFS , which was developed by Hans Reiser and others, and it has been the default filesystem on some Linux distributions. The lack of a journaling filesystem was formerly often cited as one of the major factors holding back the widespread adoption of Linux at the enterprise level. As was the case with ext2, ReiserFS was designed from the ground up for use in Linux. However, unlike ext3, it was also designed from the ground up as a journaling filesystem rather than as an add-on to an existing filesystem, and thus it was widely considered to be the most advanced of the native Linux journaling filesystems.

Features include high speed, excellent stability and the ability to pack small files into less disk space than is possible with many other filesystems. It is not clear what, if any, effect the October arrest of Hans Reiser as a suspect in the murder of his wife might have on the future of this filesystem, although shortly thereafter Novell decided to replace the default ReiserFS with ext3 in its SUSE Linux Enterprise edition.

These servers were designed for advanced graphics processing, and they thus feature the ability to accommodate huge file sizes. This has the same correctness-preserving properties as a journal without the write-twice overhead. Some Unix file system UFS implementations avoid journaling and implement soft updates. They order their writes in such a way that the on-disk file system is never inconsistent or that the only inconsistency that can be created in the event of a crash is a storage leak.

To recover from those leaks, the free space map is reconciled against a full walk of the file system at the next mount. This post introduces these two Mac file systems to you and tells you how to format a hard drive on Mac. Top Articles. We look at the history of Windows Read more. Website Shortcut on Your Desktop reviewed by Web Webster This Webopedia guide will show you how to create a website shortcut on your desktop using What are the Five Generations of Computers?

Reviewed by Web Webster Learn about each of the 5 generations of computers and major technology developments that have led to the computing devices that Launched in , Hotmail was one of the first public webmail services that could be accessed from any web browser. At its peak in Related Articles. Active 11 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 6k times. Improve this question. ThatGraemeGuy Prasoon Saurav Prasoon Saurav 3 3 silver badges 8 8 bronze badges.

Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Improve this answer. While journaling does slow down normal IO operations it does speed up recovering from an unsafe shutdown or unmount. Having to run a disk check on a multi-terabyte volume with a file system that doesn't have journaling will take days. Where a journaling file system can do it in seconds or minutes. Also most journaling file systems on Linux allow you to specify a different device for the journal to avoid the performance hit. Unfortunately this question is about NTFS which doesn't support that.

For example, if you wanted to move a file from one drive to another, the procedure would look something like the following: Physically copy old file to new location Update directory entry on new drive Remove directory entry from old drive Free space on old drive Exact process is filesystem dependent, but you get the idea. In other words, a lot can go wrong.

Something like: Journal entry: Moving file from A to B Physically copy old file to new location Update directory entry on new drive Remove directory entry from old drive Free space on old drive Journal entry: Done moving file from A to B If this process gets interrupted for any reason, such as a system crash, the filesystem now knows what was in progress, and whether it completed or not. The rule of thumb is "the more secure, the bigger performance hit". Not that the performance hit is completely acceptable given the advantages of having a journal when you have TB or even PB of data : — coredump.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000